Court of Appeal dismissed its latest appeal - ruling that riders do not fall under the scope of the trade union freedom right set out in the European Convention of Human Rights.Īlthough the Court did suggest that riders do fall under "the more general right of freedom of association under article 11. It hasn't had much success with this line of argument against Deliveroo either, though. Most recently honing in on the issue of collective bargaining and seeking to challenge the platform giant's stance under the European Convention on Human Rights - by arguing riders have a legal right to form or join a union. Uber loses gig workers rights challenge in UK Supreme Courtĭespite a string of legal loses against Deliveroo over the years, the IWGB did not give up its fight. And the interpretation of how exactly employment law applies typically hinges on exactly such nuanced details as the level of flexibility being offered to platform workers. courts from judging its drivers to be workers not self-employed contractors.ĭeliveroo, for example, allows riders to use a substitute to fulfil a shift with only limited restrictions on the practice. The on-demand food delivery platform operates a different gig model than ride-hailing giant Uber - which has, by contrast, failed to prevent U.K. that supports Deliveroo's contention that its riders are self-employed, following earlier judgments by the Central Arbitration Committee and two at the High Court. The latest appeals court ruling is the fourth judgment in the U.K. courts, beating back an appeal by the IWGB union which has sought for years to challenge the gig platform over couriers' rights but has continued to fail to overturn the company's classification of riders as self-employed. Deliveroo has had another win in the U.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |